Jews Out of the Question. A Critique of Anti-Anti-Semitism

Jews Out of the Question. A Critique of Anti-Anti-Semitism

399 pages

Hardcover

Genre: Nonfiction, Essay, Politics, Philosophy
A provocative study of opposition to anti-Semitism in contemporary political philosophy.

In post-Holocaust philosophy, anti-Semitism has come to be seen as a paradigmatic political and ideological evil. Jews Out of the Question examines the role that opposition to anti-Semitism has played in shaping contemporary political philosophy. Elad Lapidot argues that post-Holocaust philosophy identifies the fundamental, epistemological evil of anti-Semitic thought not in thinking against Jews, but in thinking of Jews. In other words, what philosophy denounces as anti-Semitic is the figure of “the Jew” in thought. Lapidot reveals how, paradoxically, opposition to anti-Semitism has generated a rejection of Jewish thought in post-Holocaust philosophy. Through critical readings of political philosophers such as Adorno, Horkheimer, Sartre, Arendt, Badiou, and Nancy, the book contends that by rejecting Jewish thought, the opposition to anti-Semitism comes dangerously close to anti-Semitism itself, and at work in this rejection, is a problematic understanding of the relations between politics and thought—a troubling political epistemology. Lapidot’s critique of this political epistemology is the book’s ultimate aim.

German title: Anti-Anti-Semitismus - Eine philosophische Kritik
ISBN: 978-3-95757-945-4
Publisher: Matthes & Seitz Berlin
Publication date: 2021
Sold to: United States, United Kingdom

Licence

Non-fiction

Sample translation

English original available

Elad Lapidot, born in Jerusalem in 1976, is a professor of Hebrew and Jewish Studies at the University of Lille. He conducts research on political epistemology in contemporary philosophy and in the Talmudic tradition of thought. 

By the same author(s)

"The book is not only an urgent call to critically engage with one of the most established sites of consensus of our time but also reveals the enormous shortcomings of that consensus, even among its most stellar and respected representatives.” Gil Anidjar